----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

Maybe a bunch of you folks could help out?
I've been complaining for several months now about a tower near Shepherd
Texas (south of Lake Livingston, north of town of Cleveland) on Houston
Sectional.   Tower is marked as 1177 feet; fly-by is closer to 2177 feet.
AOPA helped to finally get an answer from FAA:   prior owner got
permission
to add 1000 feet, then sold tower before extension was completed, new
owner
neglected to notify FAA.   Tower is TALL -- poorly lighted, poorly
painted,
not
real obvious in (frequent) Texas haze/weather.   It's just waiting to snag
some
poor fellow who's conscientiously reading his sectional.
I've asked Texas DOT to investigate enforcement of TEXAS skies, but their
reply (attached) suggests that little can be done.   At present.
But I had a thought -- since many Coupes will be flying at "low VFR"
(Coupe)
altitudes to come to the EOC Nationals this summer IN TEXAS, maybe every
one of you could complain to Mr. Fulton (email below), urging Texas DOT to
take some urgent action through the Texas Legislature immediately.
(Texas
lawmakers in session for 6 months every 2 years -- in session right now.)
THANKS -- John Trowbridge - Houston - N94783 415E

----- Original Message -----
From: David Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Karon Wiedemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Mr. Trowbridge:


Dr. Trowbridge:

I share your concerns regarding the potential safety hazards to aircraft
arising from unmarked and unlighted towers.  Several years ago, prior to
the
time I moved here from Tennessee to become Aviation Director, an effort
was
made to pass legislation to require permitting of towers which exceeded
200
feet in height.  Legislation was passed to regulate these towers, however,
all towers which require an FCC license were exempted.  Obviously, that
comprises virtually all  of the towers in question.  As a result, the
statute that was passed had little to no practical effect.

The FAA does not regulate towers either.  They do require proponents of
towers to notify them prior to erection to determine if they would have an
effect on airspace.  If the FAA feels the tower will have a negative
effect
on airspace, they will notify the FCC who will determine whether or not
the
FCC license will be issued.  I realize that this sounds rather
bureaucratic,
and it is, but  that is how the system works.

Notwithstanding all this, the proliferation of towers continues to be a
concern.  Last year 6 ag pilots died as a result of flying into either
towers or the associated guy wires.  A lady whose son died in one of the
accidents is working toward getting something done to address the problem.
She is working with the former Chairman of the Texas Ag Operators
Association, George Mitchell of Beaumont, and I believe they will attempt
to
get a bill filed requiring that these towers must be adequately marked and
lighted.  We are working with them on this.

This is a long answer to your question but I hope it helps to clarify the
situation.  If you would like to discuss further, call me at (512)
416-4502.

Dave Fulton

>>> "Life Choices/Country Life" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/05/01
09:44PM
>>>
Mr. Fulton:
Obviously I have a real concern in this regard, since I fly in
the neighborhood of this tower.   And I don't know what other
neighborhoods might have such a tower.   Unmarked.
Poorly lighted.   Poorly painted.
If you can't find an enforcement under current law, could
your department draft a simply bill that the Transportation
Committees in House and Senate could consider (and PASS!)
during THIS session?    I'd be shocked if the people of Texas
can be exposed to such dangers and have no options and
no legislative response.
Thanks
John Trowbridge MD and pilot
Houston

----- Original Message -----
From: David Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 10:39 AM
Subject: Mr. Trowbridge:


Mr. Trowbridge:

We will check into this and respond within a week to 10 days.  However,
under current law, there is probably not much we can do.

David Fulton


__________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this list please send
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less. 
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to