----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
Wayne, I've accomplished the same thing a few times by notifying Flight Service. Much easier and quicker. Syd Cohen Wayne Woollard wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > Ed: > > This may be more than you want Ed, but part 77 of Federal Aviation > Regulations, Subpart B deals with construction and notices "Critical to > Flight Safety, " They even have a form (7460-2) which can be filled out > by anyone reporting a safety related item, not adequately described, or > notified to airspace users. By utilizing this form noting proper lats, > and longs, and sent to:: > U.S. Department of Transportation > Federal Aviation Administration > Airspace and Obstruction Evaluation Branch ATP-240 > 800 Independence Avenue, S. W. > Washington, D. C. 20591 > Within a short time a mandatory NOTAM will be sent to all FSS's and > Centers until the chart in question is re-evaluated. This is a > convoluted exercise, and full of pitfalls as Trowbridge has found out. > Maybe the new administration would be more tolerant to pilot input!! > > Wayne Woollard N6596Q > > Ed Burkhead wrote: > > > > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]---- > > > > Wayne, > > > > Aren't the tower painting and lighting requirements federal law? Do you > > know the appropriate law or agency to enforce the lighting rules? > > > > Ed Burkhead > > > > Wayne Woollard wrote: > > > John: > > > > > > Towers used to be my business, and I am quite sensitive to the proper > > > notification, by the powers that be, of oversized towers. The FAA is > > > the responsible party for airway notifications, and aviation data on > > > these charts, but NOAA (Department of Commerce) is responsible for all > > > the other data, such as towers, towers that have been removed, > > > railroads, all other data on the charts, also the charts are measured > > > using NAD 83 topographic data. and the towers, and tower heights are > > > registered using NAD 27 data. > > > More than one government entity, and 4 different bureaus, recipe for a > > > foul-up, don't you agree? > > > > > > D. Wayne Woollard N6596Q > > > > __________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. > > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 > > __________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ____________________________________________________________ > T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. > http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 __________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ____________________________________________________________ T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
