A test case for a variety of selectors up here: http://barneycarroll.com/validCSSselectors.html
Ones in green work, ones in red don't. On 30 March 2011 16:39, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: >Only if you believe in anarchy, surely ? The line between philosophy & politics blurs! If it works, I'll do it. If it doesn't I won't. The question is ideological and we could debate it for yonks. Ultimately, I believe posters come here for practical advice. If they were looking for the spec, a bot could do a better job than the lot of us. On 30 March 2011 16:39, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: >in order to pander to the inability >of browser vendors to W3C specifications Browser vendors v W3C is a Gordian knot. Alexander's sword is the user. If they're happy, so am I (and the clients, etc). Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carr...@gmail.com 07594 506 381 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
