On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 23:25:12 -0400, Chris Rockwell
<[email protected]> wrote:
>My question is, how would you all approach this? Right now I'm thinking IE
>7 can't be ignored, but I'd have to consider time/value when deciding what
>is acceptable.
Depending on what sort of fancy effects you want, I'd just tend to write
to the standard, and not really worry about specific IE support; IE8 and
later actually seem to do pretty well in that respect. I think that IE7
can largely be ignored, but I'd recommend taking a closer look at the
analytics, beyond just the raw percentages, before making that decision.
The move off Windows XP has been amazingly slow, and XP still has
sizeable market share. Since Microsoft has not released IE9 or later for
XP, as long as XP has a significant share, I don't think you will want
to abandon support for IE8, if you feel you need IE-specific support at
all.
--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
The Electronic Fan-Supported
Traveller® Fanzine and Resource
[email protected]
http://www.freelancetraveller.com
http://come.to/freelancetraveller
http://freelancetraveller.downport.com/
®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2009. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.
Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:
CyberNET Web Hosting (http://www.cyberwebhosting.net)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
