Great discussion all. Clearly IE8 needs to be a part of my review, as it accounts for more than 17% of traffic (on this project at least; btw, it doesn't surprise me that there is slower adoption in this market).
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/21/13 2:44 PM, Freelance Traveller wrote: > >> I'd just tend to write >> to the standard, >> > And what would that standard be? It's almost as though there are two: the > w3c-compliant world, and the IE world. > > John > > ______________________________**______________________________**__________ > css-discuss [[email protected]] > http://www.css-discuss.org/**mailman/listinfo/css-d<http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d> > List wiki/FAQ -- > http://css-discuss.incutio.**com/<http://css-discuss.incutio.com/> > List policies -- > http://css-discuss.org/**policies.html<http://css-discuss.org/policies.html> > Supported by evolt.org -- > http://www.evolt.org/help_**support_evolt/<http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/> > -- Chris Rockwell ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
