> you may do better to contact your browser vendor directly and ask them to investigate the rendering issues you have reported
I'm wondering how differently my career might have worked out if all those times IE came up I'd just told the client to get onto Bill Gates about it. Maybe I'm just a sucker for punishment ;) Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carr...@gmail.com +44 7429 177278 barneycarroll.com On 7 October 2014 12:48, Philip Taylor <p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > > Barney Carroll wrote: > > This begs the question: how much should one expound on browsers that one >> is unfamiliar with, in general? >> > > One should not expound on them at all : one should simply state "Our HTML > and CSS are W3C-compliant and W3C-validated, and, as far as we are aware, > render correctly in all browsers that are themselves W3C-compliant. If > they do not render as you would wish in the browser of your choice, please > draw this to our attention. We take great pride in the material we > produce, but if it renders correctly in browsers that are themselves > W3C-compliant, we are unlikely to expend major effort in also making it > render appropriately in less-compliant browsers -- you may do better to > contact your browser vendor directly and ask them to investigate the > rendering issues you have reported". > > Philip Taylor > ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
