-Caveat Lector-
If you are going to spew forth such absolute bullshit, please document it.
What academic sources are you using in your "research" on the conditions
of blacks in the American South during the days of slavery?
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Hawk wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > I'm all for your right to own an elephant, Hawk.
> > Go for it.
> >
> > However, I think your argument that private owners make better
> > caretakers because they are interested in protecting their investment
> > might be a little weak.
>
> I don't think its weak at all... Most people don't take care of "other peoples'
>stuff" as well
> as they care for their own... I'll bet you use more generous portions of toilet
>paper in a motel
> than you do when you're directly paying for it. Ever heard the old saying, "I'll
>beat you like
> a government mule"??? The basis for that little phrase is that people just don't
>take care of
> government stuff as well as they do their own. There are a zillion examples to
>support it.
>
> > It resembles the arguments used by white slaveowners during the Abolitionist
>debates... "We
> > love our slaves...after all, they're investments.. We have to take care of them
>or they lose
> > their value.."
>
> It was, I might add, a valid argument. I've done a bit of research in that aspect
>of economics
> and history. For your information, the typical Negro slave received back, over the
>period of
> his life, about 90% of the wealth he produced... He had a longer life expectency
>than white
> Europeans of the time, and was better off in practically every measurable aspect of
>economic
> life and physical health than was any "peasant class" worker in the world
>(specifically factory
> workers in the industrial north and Europe).
>
> Hawk
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
