Due to the length of your letter and the required
answers... I will respond to you with a different color
in between what you wrote in the below written letter... with what I feel
is something to respond to.
----- Original Message -----
From: JAH Publications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect
member (fwd)
> Dear Eagle 1,
>
> Hello. I hope you are well and am very glad that you have found the dialogue
> amazing because I wouldn't like people to find it boring.
>
> Hello. I hope you are well and am very glad that you have found the dialogue
> amazing because I wouldn't like people to find it boring.
>>Amazing in
the fact that you are so egotistical in your responses to people in the CTRL
group and other mail that you have thrown up in front of everyone everywhere you
go, and that you try to come off as some rocket scientist of
religion.
I am also glad
> that you have quoted Ezekiel 34 because it is one of my favourite pieces and
> I have, in fact, explained it in great detail on my website.
> that you have quoted Ezekiel 34 because it is one of my favourite pieces and
> I have, in fact, explained it in great detail on my website.
OH, I've been to your website...
and I've also noticed all the "my's" and "I's" you use there and in your
correspondence. A bit narcisistic in presentation!
Perhaps you
> might like to take a look at it. Its URL address is:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/rabbis.htm
>
> From what you have said about the so-called christian priests
> might like to take a look at it. Its URL address is:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/rabbis.htm
>
> From what you have said about the so-called christian priests
See, there ya go... taking what
I've said out of context. I said the 'SHEPHERDS'. How you got
Priests out of Shepherds? I have no clue. Also the chapter
referenced, that you seem to be so fond of, uses the terminology
repeatedly "shepherd". There is a difference between Shepherds and
Priests, throughout the Bible. Here in this passage and other places
or didn't you know?
giving
> Christianity a black eye, whom I also mention in the above explanation and
> about whom you and I are in total agreement, you should love the
> explanation. Please feel free to show it to your friends.
> Christianity a black eye, whom I also mention in the above explanation and
> about whom you and I are in total agreement, you should love the
> explanation. Please feel free to show it to your friends.
Again, what an ego
maniac you are. No wonder people give you such a hard
time.
>
> Of course you are allowed to believe as you wish; everyone has their
> free-will. It is one of The Laws of this planet.
>
> Of course you are allowed to believe as you wish; everyone has their
> free-will. It is one of The Laws of this planet.
Live as you will by the
"Laws of this planet". I will choose to live by the Laws of God.
>
> What Revelation 11:9 states, and you have misquoted, is that
>
> What Revelation 11:9 states, and you have misquoted, is that
ARGUE as you will, it was NOT
misquoted... you have misinterpreted Revelation, obviously...
and I'm sure you believe in the rapture too?
Oh well, to each their own.
The Ark of The
> Covenant will be (in the future) seen in the City called NEW Jerusalem that
> John saw COMING DOWN out of heaven (a UFO?)and of course it will be, when it
> comes down in the near future. After I have retrieved it from Tara, in
> fulfillment of Malachi 4.
> Covenant will be (in the future) seen in the City called NEW Jerusalem that
> John saw COMING DOWN out of heaven (a UFO?)and of course it will be, when it
> comes down in the near future. After I have retrieved it from Tara, in
> fulfillment of Malachi 4.
LOL Go ahead...
make my day! LOL! no not just LOL, but
ROTFL!
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/noah.htm
>
> As you have correctly stated: God is not stupid; for which I can personally
> vouch.
Yes, exactly what I said. I am not
speaking for God, as *you* seem to be... I was simply reiterating that He
follows His own rules to the "T". He has NEVER left artifacts for man to
brood over and discover, except for those that are so large, so huge,
that man can only wonder about them, they cannot be possessed by any one
hu-man at any given time in this earth age.
But then you go on to say that He would not be so
stupid as to leave
> The Ark on Earth. So, by so doing, you are actually telling God that you
> think He is stupid for doing so. And you think I'm trying to place myself
> above God?
> The Ark on Earth. So, by so doing, you are actually telling God that you
> think He is stupid for doing so. And you think I'm trying to place myself
> above God?
YES I do think you are attempting to put
yourself above God.
What then are you doing when you call Him
stupid?
THAT is YOUR misinterpretation, again, of
what I said, and what I meant. I never said He was stupid. YOU
did. YOU misinterpret many things... Perhaps you should get your communication skills a bit
more together before you go out and attempt to save the world. You've got
to know how to 'listen' as well as to 'speak'.
>
> The Ark HAS TO BE on Earth
>
> The Ark HAS TO BE on Earth
WHO says it HAS to be on the earth? WHERE
do you get that idea? Only those who have their eyes poised as "to grasp"
it and it's power would even begin to reason such an antic. NO... it
does NOT have to be ON THE EARTH. And just for the doubt of it all,
so what if it is? What does it prove? NOTHING. It proves
absolutely nothing! The Ark of the Covenant was given to a space and time
that God chose it to exist in. For HIS PURPOSES, not ours.
That time is over, long long ago. Even as Paul has told us in his
writings, those things of that time were a shadow of what is to
come. CHRIST became all things that REPLACED the ark of the covenant. IF you have
not figured that one out yet, you have a "long way to go, baby".
>because it is God's Witness against His
People.
LOL
A witness against His people? WHO and
WHERE is it said that GOD NEEDS A WITNESS AGAINST HIS PEOPLE?
LOL JAH, Really! Gimme a break.
You want a witness against the people?
Look around you. Death, destruction, wars, disease, biological weapons,
perversion, EVIL. THAT is the witness against His people.
NATURALLY. Man has brought this witness upon himself. GOD does not
need an artifact to prove Himself!
> It cannot act as His Witness if it is not here to WITNESS what the people
> are doing.
What??? a box of sandstone,
rotted paper, an old stick and wood? THAT is what you call a
witness??? LOL ! The antichrists of the world will salute you
for your efforts! What a joke!
> If you want to know why it is my job to recover The Ark then I suggest you
> go to my website at:-
>
I saw all I wanted to see... NO I DON'T
NEED TO GO TO YOUR WEBSITE!
and neither should anyone with any common
sense.
> I repeat that a little knowledge is a very
dangerous thing and you too
> obvioulsy consider yourself to be another expert, like Penny does, who knows
> more about God than His servant does.
> obvioulsy consider yourself to be another expert, like Penny does, who knows
> more about God than His servant does.
What in the world kind of statement is
that, JAH! Still full of yourself!
AGAIN ROTFL JAH...
YOUR LIMITED KNOWLEDGE IS VERY
DANGEROUS!! Take a swallow of your own words /
medicine.
> You are right that it will not be recovered until the end of this age. This
> is the end of this age. Read:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/signs.htm
>
> and then you will KNOW that it is the "End Time".
>
> You say no hu-man is worthy to discover the things of God. Where did, or
> when did I say that I am a hu-man? Is it laughable?
> You are right that it will not be recovered until the end of this age. This
> is the end of this age. Read:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/signs.htm
>
> and then you will KNOW that it is the "End Time".
>
> You say no hu-man is worthy to discover the things of God. Where did, or
> when did I say that I am a hu-man? Is it laughable?
THEN what are YOU? IF you are not a
human?
They laughed at Noah too
SURE! I'm laughing at you.... but
not the way the people laughed at Noah!
I laugh at you with PITY
and shame that you bring such lies and ignorance to the masses and especially to
the internet. SHAME ON YOU!!! Of course, as you well
know, YOU will answer for your actions. And as you imply with your
extremely large egotism, you are ready for the consequences. And I
certainly hope you are ready.
> and we all know what happened to them because of their arrogant unbelief.
> Calling God stupid as you have done is not verging on blasphemy; it is
> blasphemy.
YOU are soooooo WRONG! I never said
that, you put words where they were not even implied and it is your own
MIS-INTERPRETATION.
For your information; I never act and I NEVER play
church because
> Jesus told everyone in Matthew 6:6 NOT to go to church.
> Jesus told everyone in Matthew 6:6 NOT to go to church.
GOOD... keep up at least one good thing.
>
> Ireland is neither in the desert nor in a secret place. Everyone knows where
> Ireland is or can look it up on a map. I am pleased to be able to agree with
> a lot of what you have said and would like you to calm down and stop
> breaking the Eleventh Commandment and look at my website for yourself, with,
> if possible, an open mind, because I feel sure that you will find it
> extremely enlightening and enjoy it, as long as you approach it with the
> right attitude. Perhaps then you might even like to help me to obtain a
> permit to dig from Sile de Valera, so I can recover The Ark and show it to
> you, so you can then apologise to God for calling Him stupid.
Again, that is YOUR interpretation of
what I said. Not what I said, nor what I meant or even
implied. HOW DARE YOU! You will also answer for misjudging someone
you don't know from Adam.
>
> Throughout the history of the ages, Satan has always used people who thought
> they understood the Scriptures to attack those who do, by getting them to
> misquote the Scriptures and shout down those who speak the Truth, so it will
> not be heard. It seems that nothing has changed; exactly as Jesus
> prophesied. Go away from me those who call me Lord (christians) but do not
> do the things I say; I know you not.
>
> Peace be upon you,
THAT is NOT what Christ said, JAH. Just
like satan, misquoting just one word, in the temptation. Just one
itsy bitsy word was misquoted. But Christ recognized it. Of course
He would!!! I recognize you in the same respect. I don't want your
"Peace", you who call yourself JAH! Because if you truly understood
the Scriptures, you would understand what Christ said about this very
statement... "Peace be upon you", and you would not use it.
"For many deceivers are
entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the
flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Look to yourselves,
that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a
full reward. Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of
Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he
hath both the Father and the Son.
IF there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not unto your house, neither bid him God speed: for he that bideth (such as "Peace be upon you"), him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." II John
IF there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not unto your house, neither bid him God speed: for he that bideth (such as "Peace be upon you"), him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." II John
Personally, I do not
care to be a partaker of your evil deeds. I shake the dust and go my
way, as I suspect would be best for you to do, also.
eagle 1
PS - Just for the
record.. You do not have the right or the privilege, or my permission to
use anything I've said in this email either public or private anywhere else on
or off the internet. IF you so choose to do so, I will persue the
legal aspect of internet law against you. eagle
1
>
> JAH.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eagle 1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member (fwd)
----- Original Message -----
From: JAH Publications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as
sect member (fwd)
>
> Dear Eagle 1,
>
> Hello. I hope you are well and am very glad that you have found the dialogue
> amazing because I wouldn't like people to find it boring. I am also glad
> that you have quoted Ezekiel 34 because it is one of my favourite pieces and
> I have, in fact, explained it in great detail on my website. Perhaps you
> might like to take a look at it. Its URL address is:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/rabbis.htm
>
> From what you have said about the so-called christian priests giving
> Christianity a black eye, whom I also mention in the above explanation and
> about whom you and I are in total agreement, you should love the
> explanation. Please feel free to show it to your friends.
>
> Of course you are allowed to believe as you wish; everyone has their
> free-will. It is one of The Laws of this planet.
>
> What Revelation 11:9 states, and you have misquoted, is that The Ark of The
> Covenant will be (in the future) seen in the City called NEW Jerusalem that
> John saw COMING DOWN out of heaven (a UFO?)and of course it will be, when it
> comes down in the near future. After I have retrieved it from Tara, in
> fulfillment of Malachi 4.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/noah.htm
>
> As you have correctly stated: God is not stupid; for which I can personally
> vouch. But then you go on to say that He would not be so stupid as to leave
> The Ark on Earth. So, by so doing, you are actually telling God that you
> think He is stupid for doing so. And you think I'm trying to place myself
> above God? What then are you doing when you call Him stupid?
>
> The Ark HAS TO BE on Earth because it is God's Witness against His People.
> It cannot act as His Witness if it is not here to WITNESS what the people
> are doing.
>
> If you want to know why it is my job to recover The Ark then I suggest you
> go to my website at:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/
>
> and then click on JAH on the homepage.
>
> I repeat that a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing and you too
> obvioulsy consider yourself to be another expert, like Penny does, who knows
> more about God than His servant does.
>
> You are right that it will not be recovered until the end of this age. This
> is the end of this age. Read:-
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/signs.htm
>
> and then you will KNOW that it is the "End Time".
>
> You say no hu-man is worthy to discover the things of God. Where did, or
> when did I say that I am a hu-man? Is it laughable? They laughed at Noah too
> and we all know what happened to them because of their arrogant unbelief.
> Calling God stupid as you have done is not verging on blasphemy; it is
> blasphemy. For your information; I never act and I NEVER play church because
> Jesus told everyone in Matthew 6:6 NOT to go to church.
>
> Ireland is neither in the desert nor in a secret place. Everyone knows where
> Ireland is or can look it up on a map. I am pleased to be able to agree with
> a lot of what you have said and would like you to calm down and stop
> breaking the Eleventh Commandment and look at my website for yourself, with,
> if possible, an open mind, because I feel sure that you will find it
> extremely enlightening and enjoy it, as long as you approach it with the
> right attitude. Perhaps then you might even like to help me to obtain a
> permit to dig from Sile de Valera, so I can recover The Ark and show it to
> you, so you can then apologise to God for calling Him stupid.
>
> Throughout the history of the ages, Satan has always used people who thought
> they understood the Scriptures to attack those who do, by getting them to
> misquote the Scriptures and shout down those who speak the Truth, so it will
> not be heard. It seems that nothing has changed; exactly as Jesus
> prophesied. Go away from me those who call me Lord (christians) but do not
> do the things I say; I know you not.
>
> Peace be upon you,
>
> JAH.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eagle 1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 6:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member (fwd)
>
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > This dialogue in the messages attached is truly amazing...
> >
> > To Pennie and JAH and whomever else may be interested:
> > Everyone is entitled to believe as they wish to... allow me to believe as
> I
> > so choose.
> > It is my own PERSONAL BELIEF that the ark of the covenant will *never* be
> > found in this earth age, or on the face of this earth until God so
> chooses.
> >
> > In Revelation 11:19 "And the temple of God was opened [for all to see] in
> > heaven, and there was seen in His temple the ark of His testament [also
> > known as the ark of the covenant] ..." He clearly states in this passage
> > alone, that the ark is in heaven... where ever that is.
> >
> > One would assume by implication of the scriptures, by the name 'Emmanuel'
> > or 'Immanuel' as stated in Matthew, Mark and Luke chapter 1, which means
> > "Yah dwells with us", and with the conception of Christ, He is so
> dwelling
> > and continues to do so. WHERE He is in each of our lives is private
> > information between each individual and God Himself. (It is no one else's
> > business, because no one will stand for you on judgment day, except you
> and
> > Christ, the principle advocate. The slate will either be clean or filthy.
> > There is no in between and there is no hiding the record of the book from
> > the ultimate Judge).
> >
> > If *God left no artifacts*, including not leaving the body of Moses, nor
> > the body of Christ after their deaths, what makes anyone think that God
> > would be stupid enough to leave behind an article such as the 'ark of the
> > covenant'? He is not stupid, and He didn't leave it! It won't be
> found,
> > until EVERYONE, (that is A-L-L), see it in His temple as stated in
> > Revelation 11:19. It simply makes no sense to think that God will prefer
> > any one hu-man over another to discover this holy item or any other holy
> > item on the face of the earth. Taking from scriptural knowledge, in
> > Revelation, NO MAN WAS WORTHY TO OPEN THE BOOK. In the same respect,
> why
> > would you think, JAH, that you alone are most worthy to find and possess
> > the 'ark of the covenant'??? That is almost laughable... and verges on
> > blasphemy. God knows men's hearts better than they do; they are greedy,
> > selfish and unforgiving. God is not going to give to man what is HIS
> until
> > the end of this age. God has given more than enough since the beginning.
> > God is not happy with man and man's decisions to follow other gods and
> other
> > doctrines than those He has set forth in His book - See Ezekiel chapter 34
> > for a run down on this. ANYONE who professes to know the truth of God,
> and
> > so convey it by teaching or by example is considered a 'shepherd of the
> > people' ... and according to God there are many out there that HE DID NOT
> > SEND to the people. They are self annointed, self righteous hypocrits!
> That
> > is exactly what Jesus called the Pharisees many times; and it wasn't
> because
> > he couldn't find other words to describe them... He meant what he said,
> > "hypocrits", who are nothing more than "play actors", those who love to
> > "play church"; those who come in the name of God, but God did not send.
> > THOSE are the ones that give true Christianity a black eye. And is it no
> > wonder that so many in the world do not know or understand the foundations
> > of Christianity; nor from what they've heard do they want to know.
> > Personally, I don't blame them, when they know they've been lied to
> going
> > in the gate.
> >
> > Properly interpreted, the scriptures in that same mentioned chapter of
> > Matthew 24 clearly state in plain english, "... Then if any man shall say
> > unto you, 'LO! here is Christ **[which includes the personnages, His
> > temple, the furniture in the temple and all that belongs to God]**,
> > BELIEVE IT NOT!
> > For there shall arise false Christs [those making claims to all things
> > concerning God] and false prophets, and shall show great signs and
> wonders;
> > insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
> > Behold, I have told you [all things] before [in advance].
> > Wherefore if they shall say unto you, BEHOLD! HE [anything that pertains
> to
> > the true God and His Savior] is in the desert, go not forth; BEHOLD HE is
> > in the secret chambers [those making claims to esoteric knowledge];
> believe
> > it not! For as the lightening cometh out of the east and shineth even
> unto
> > the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
> > Matthew 24:23-27
> >
> > It's simply saying that until the true Christ appears, and as long as you
> > are in the flesh body, you are not going to possess, nor see the things of
> > God.
> >
> > Pennie implicated false prophet, false information was being spread...
> > I have to agree.
> >
> > Keep up the good work Pennie! Uncovering the sugar coated lies of satan,
> is
> > what business of our Father's we are to be at. Thanks for this expose`.
> >
> > eagle 1
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: JAH Publications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 13, 1999 11:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member (fwd)
> >
> >
> > > -Caveat Lector-
> > >
> > > Dear Pennie,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your nice compliment about my maturity.
> > >
> > > How would you know whether I have quoted the Scriptures out of context
> or
> > > not. You are doing it again. Claiming to be an expert on God, when it is
> > > quite obvious that you do not know what you are talking about. Have you
> > not
> > > heard that: a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing.
> > >
> > > How would you know what God would and wouldn't do? You talk as though He
> > > would first need to consult you and ask you what He is allowed to do.
> > > Amazing really.
> > >
> > > The Ruler of The Universe has said quite clearly that The Ark and The
> > > Covenant containing His Laws is the one thing to save the world. Please
> > read
> > > that Bible you boast about having and look at the last page of the Old
> > > Covenant/Testament, or click on JAH on my homepage, and read what it
> says
> > in
> > > Malachi chapter 4 and you will see that it is not a sign, but a warning.
> I
> > > can assure you that He IS going to bring it out in His Own time, very
> > soon;
> > > as soon as I get the permit to dig.
> > >
> > > I have not separated myself from God, as you wrongly state, because it
> is
> > He
> > > who has sent me to recover it. Perhaps it would be a good idea for you
> to
> > > access The King of kings' Bible advert on my site, to be able to see
> that
> > > unlike you who only claims to read the whole Bible, I have compiled it
> > with
> > > all the bits the governments conspired about and took out of it because
> > they
> > > didn't want people to read them.
> > >
> > > If you really understood the Scriptures instead of just thinking that
> you
> > > do, then you would know that God had Jeremiah take The Ark away from the
> > > Jews in 588 B.C. and give it to the "Lost" Ten Tribed House of Israel,
> in
> > > exile. All of which is explained in detail on my website at:-
> > > http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/
> > >
> > > If you access the Jeremiah's Tomb article and follow the links then you
> > > should be able to see that you are wrong and learn the truth. However,
> > there
> > > are none so blind as those who refuse to see. So, I just hope that you
> can
> > > calm down; open your eyes and your mind and see and recognise the truth
> on
> > > my website.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your kind wishes of good luck, but in my experience there
> is
> > > no such thing as luck and I don't need to dig up all of Ireland; only a
> > tiny
> > > area of grass measuring 2 metres by 2 metres, because I know exactly
> where
> > > it is. All I am waiting for is the permit to dig, so I won't be breaking
> > > Irish law.
> > >
> > > Thank you also for your friendly tip about not touching The Ark, but you
> > see
> > > I have to touch it and open it in order to show The Tablets and Scrolls
> > (The
> > > Torah) to the world as it says in Malachi 4. How else could the whole
> > world
> > > be reminded to return to God's Laws, all at once, just before the Last
> > Day?
> > >
> > > If you really want to prove me wrong then help me to get the permit to
> dig
> > > that I have asked everyone to help with and then I can touch it and if
> I'm
> > > wrong I will die. But I can assure you that I will be perfectly safe,
> > > because it is my job.
> > >
> > > I will not be the least bit offended if you don't kiss my bottom and
> > anyone
> > > reading your messages and my messages will have no doubt in their mind
> as
> > to
> > > which one of us is being neurotic. If you think I'm an idiot, then
> people
> > > can read what is on my site and make their own minds up about that too,
> > and
> > > hopefully they will, as many have already and complimented me on it.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm sorry that you don't like it. It is not meant to offend anyone, but
> > > unfortunately the truth often has that effect on some people.
> > >
> > > Peace be upon you,
> > >
> > > JAH.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: pennie hammons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 11:08 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member (fwd)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Wow, your maturity level is stunning. Your postings speak for
> > themselves.
> > > > Did you purposefully capitalize the word "messenger" because you think
> > you
> > > > are a divine entity? Please say it was a typo!
> > > > You have quoted scripture out of context to prove any point you wish.
> I
> > do
> > > > not need a website to publicize every concept I might have about God,
> I
> > > have
> > > > the Bible to refer to for the truth (the WHOLE Bible, not just the
> parts
> > I
> > > > like). Your pleas for a permit to dig up the ark are enough for me to
> > see
> > > > that you have separated yourself from the will of God to seek your own
> > > > glory. God does not need a permit to recover the ark and He wouldn't
> use
> > > > it's discovery to prove He is real. You act like it is the one thing
> to
> > > save
> > > > the world; a great sign of the Truth. Jesus said a wicked and
> adulterous
> > > > generation asks for a sign, but none will be given it. First of all,
> the
> > > ark
> > > > is exactly where God wants it to be and will bring it out in His own
> > time,
> > > > if ever. That is a material thing that merely represents Christ.
> > Secondly,
> > > > we know from the Bible that the ark is most assuredly in Israel, as
> any
> > > > other country possessing it would be cursed until its return, so good
> > luck
> > > > digging up all of Ireland seeking your fame. Here's a tip from me to
> > you:
> > > If
> > > > you do find it, don't think for a minute you are righteous enough to
> > touch
> > > > it. As for my boyfriend and I...well, you are an idiot!
> > > > If you insist on posting your neurotic website in answer to all the
> > > world's
> > > > problems, don't get offended when we all don't bow down and kiss your
> > a$$.
> > > > Love, Pennie
> > > >
> > > > >From: " JAH Publications" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >CC: "Conspiracy Theory Research List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member
> (fwd)
> > > > >Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:17:25 -0000
> > > > >
> > > > >Dear Pennie,
> > > > >
> > > > >Hello, I hope you are well. The following is in answer to your
> > unprovoked
> > > > >outburst against me.
> > > > >
> > > > >You don't think that Joshua2 was actually telling the truth and was
> > being
> > > > >serious about his wife leaving him do you? The lies he told in that
> > part
> > > > >were obviously intended as a joke, although how anyone can think that
> > > > >telling lies is funny, tells us a lot about them and speaks for
> itself.
> > > > >So why in those circumstances would you think it was a bad statement
> to
> > > > >make?
> > > > >If his wife had really left him, I would agree with you.
> > > > >It was his comments that followed the lies about his wife that were
> > > > >the most offensive.
> > > > >
> > > > >I actually feel sorry for Joshua2 because he seems incapable of doing
> > > > >anything other than insult me just because he chooses to disagree
> with
> > > me.
> > > > >He has done it yet again in his most recent message.* Perhaps, if he
> > has
> > > > >time, he will grow out of it. I, on the other hand, have insulted
> > > no-one.
> > > > >Joshua2 obviously does not agree with freedom-of-speech; except when
> he
> > > is
> > > > >doing the speaking of course.
> > > > >
> > > > >* "Dear JAH Dude,
> > > > >
> > > > >It is quite obvious that you are insane. I suggest a long rest and
> > don't
> > > > >forget your medicine.
> > > > >
> > > > >I'll be here after New Year 2000 to greet you when you come back to
> > > planet
> > > > >Earth.
> > > > >
> > > > >Have a nice Millennium,
> > > > >
> > > > >Joshua2"
> > > > >
> > > > >Are you Joshua2's girlfriend? because you seem to think very much
> like
> > > him.
> > > > >Perhaps, if you aren't, you should get in touch with him. You'll
> > probably
> > > > >get
> > > > >on well together.
> > > > >
> > > > >How would you know whether I have translated the Scriptures correctly
> > or
> > > > >not,
> > > > >or whether God would use a space-ship or not, or what Christ would or
> > > > >wouldn't do, or that I am, as you call me, a false Prophet or not?
> That
> > > > >same
> > > > >phrase has been used against every Prophet who has ever warned people
> > of
> > > > >coming events and how to survive them, which is all that I am doing.
> If
> > > you
> > > > >don't like the message then exercise your own free-will and reject
> and
> > > > >ignore it, like the people did with Noah. All I ask is some civility
> > and
> > > > >that you don't insult the Messenger, perhaps naively, going on the
> past
> > > > >record on this planet.
> > > > >
> > > > >You obviously consider yourself to be an expert on these things. So
> > where
> > > > >is
> > > > >your website so we can see it and make up our own minds, whether you
> > know
> > > > >what you're talking about.
> > > > >Judge a tree by the fruit it bears.
> > > > >
> > > > >Joshua2's email address, just in case you are not his girlfriend,
> is:-
> > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >My website is there for the whole world to see, so that they can look
> > at
> > > it
> > > > >and make up their own minds, for which they do not need your opinion.
> > So
> > > > >why
> > > > >are you, like Joshua2, so forcefully giving it to everyone? They,
> like
> > > the
> > > > >two people below and many others who love my site, are capable of
> > making
> > > up
> > > > >their own minds, without your help.
> > > > >
> > > > >For those who would like to make up their own minds, my website
> address
> > > > >is:-
> > > > >http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/2012/
> > > > >
> > > > >If only one person in 6,000,000,000 appreciates and is helped by my
> > site,
> > > > >it will make all the time; effort and the few insults worthwhile.
> > However
> > > I
> > > > >have already had word from a lot more than one person who absolutely
> > love
> > > > >it, so things ARE really worthwhile.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Peace be upon you, and your boyfriend Joshua2
> > > > >
> > > > >JAH.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: pennie hammons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 6:55 PM
> > > > >Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member
> (fwd)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -Caveat Lector-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "JAH" is a false prophet. Anyone who thinks God flies around in a
> > UFO
> > > > >has
> > > > > > belittled God. God created the universe and life. Does He really
> > need
> > > a
> > > > > > space craft to carry Him around? The concept is ridiculous. jah
> > likes
> > > to
> > > > > > hear himself talk, he has interpreted the scriptures accurately in
> > > some
> > > > > > places, but doesn't have a full understanding of Christ. A truly
> > > loving
> > > > > > being doesn't say "I can understand why your wife left you" when
> > > > >criticized.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >From: Rodrigo Cesar Banhara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > >Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: [CTRL] OT?: Angel Scroll names Jesus as sect member
> > > (fwd)
> > > > > > >Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 13:37:33 -0300
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Caveat Lector-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >On Thu, 11 Nov 1999 03:14:29 -0700, MICHAEL SPITZER wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >P.S. Don't let those chumps that have been rude towars your
> > > > > > > >message over the last 36 hours discourage you AT ALL....i.e.,
> > > > > > > >TIME IS SHORT, and you just gotta stay with those spirits THAT
> > > > > > > >ARE ABLE TO _HEAR_ YOUR UNIQUE INSIGHTS, i.e., there ain't no
> way
> > > > > > > >time enough to waste even replying to ppl that CAN'T HEAR!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I agree, Mike! The site of our friend JAH is very interesting.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
