-Caveat Lector-
>The significance of this series, to me, was that it explained what
happened
to the U.S. Space Program after 1975 better than anything else I have
seen.
That doesn’t mean it’s true.
>Prior to then there are good histories by many astronauts and others
associated with the space program. Most write very little or nothing
about
the space program after Project Apollo ended. Could that be because the
Shuttle program was rushed into use as spy apparatus after all U.S. spy
satellites were destroyed, as stated in "Fire From The Sky?" If anyone
has a
better explanation I would love to see it.
Maybe they have trouble finding publishers because there isn’t much of a
market. On the whole, the public is bored to tears with NASA.
>Unfortunately many took the significance of the series to be that the
Nazis
escaped. That, to me, was a side issue. I was accused of being a
neo-Nazi,
an anti-semite and a "Nazi historian" when I didn't even write the
series.
The essence of effective disinformation is that it is almost all true.
The lies are slipped in, usually as tangents. In fact, the Nazi
hierarchy did get away and they got away with the money. They had major
assistance from western especially US, intelligence and from the
Vatican. All this saucer/Antarctica hooey is disinfo to cover up how it
really happened.
>The other unfortunate aspect of this is the absence of good information
gives credence to the ridiculous claims that Project Apollo astronauts
never
went to the moon.
Only to the gullible. It does, however, raise some interesting questions
which should be investigated. There is, for example, the distinct
possibility that the Biefeld-Brown effect has made rocketry obsolete,
that this has been covered up (for a variety of reasons) and that NASA
is essentially a massive boondoggle, an enormous black hole into which
money can be made to disappear.
See: http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/15.html
>I find it interesting that Nessie and "One Who Knows" used some of the
same
sources in their research. Research, which I might add, is confined to
published material in print and on the web. As far as I know, neither
interviewed anyone with first-hand knowledge.
Yeah, that’s a real problem. I, personally, wasn’t born till 1948, so I
missed out on the Nazi escape. But even if I had been alive and of age,
unless I had been in with the in crowd, I never would have been told
what was happening.
The same problem exists with modern covert activities, especially when
they concern such a massive and layered entity as NASA. NASA, we must
remember, was founded primarily by Nazi scientists. It would be foolish
to assume that they stopped being Nazis, or part of the underground Nazi
apparatus, just because they were Paperclipped into this country. For
details, read the Torbitt Document.
>The primary difference is that "One Who Knows" used the writings of
Commander Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn, as channeled through George Green and
Doris
Ekker.
Channeling is a lot of superstitious clap-trap. It’s nothing but
Nineteenth Century spiritualism dressed up in modern clothes. It’s
swapped frocked coats and bustles for tie-dye and crystals, but it’s
still just as hollow inside. Fools believe in channeling and, like the
fools of the Nineteenth Century are soon parted from their money.
>A word of warning: Calvin is quite sensitive about any questioning of
his
conclusions about the world. When I suggested by email last year that
the
group that was heard planning the JFK assassination which included J.
Edgar
Hoover, George Herbert Walker Bush and Lyndon Johnson (among others)
might
have been shapeshifting aliens or clones of those people, he stopped
communicating with me.
Neither of these things are even remotely possible. Cloning wasn’t
possible early enough. Shape shifting defies the laws of physics.
>Things that don't
make sense begin to make a lot more sense, especially the way the U.S.
government acts in the face of anything it cannot rationally explain.
If by “make sense” you mean that the theory has internal logic and
consistency, then yes it does. However, a valid theory must have more
than internal logic and consistency. it must be grounded in empirical
fact.
>Falkland Islands.
Can be easily explained by internal Argentine politics.
>Grenada.
By the airstrip.
>Waco.
Happened three days after conviction, at their second trial, of two of
the cops who beat Rodney King. Even holding a second trial was a sing of
weakness and a concession to the mob. Waco was Uncle Sam’s way of
showing he could still get it up.
Also, Waco, spawned a panoply of resistance grouplets, many armed. This
in turn served to justify the dramatic increase in repression and
surveillance we have seen and the accompanying reduction in basic civil
rights and liberties. This was further exasperated by
>World Trade Center.
and
>Oklahoma City.
Both of which were the work of agents provocateur.
>Kobe.
was in all likelihood a natural event. Yeah, earthquakes, even volcanic
eruptions, can be induced, but there is no reason to believe that’s what
happened at Kobe. The only thing different about Kobe was the degree to
which the Japanese government was unprepared. That’s about politics, not
covert science.
>Challenger.
does present a mystery. It could have been sabotage. NASA management is
at it’s core Nazi and the entire contingent of non white astronauts died
on the Challenger. Most likely, though, it was politics. The ship wasn’t
ready to fly but Reagan ordered it to fly anyway because he wanted it in
orbit while he spoke the next day.
>Hurricanes.
Happen every year.
>Strange weather.
“Strange” is a subjective analysis. We don’t know enough about weather
yet to tell what is strange and what is not.
>TWA 800.
See: http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/30.html
>KAL 007.
Was over Russian airspace, apparently spying. If I was a Russian I’d
have shot it down too.
>Add your own items to the list.
The trouble with attempting to attribute a single cause, or set of
causes, so many mysteries is that it obscures the myriad, and often
quite discernible actual causes. What’s more, it engenders a mind set
that makes it virtually impossible for a researcher to employ objective
analysis. If, for example, you believe that we are ruled by shape
shifting aliens (or the Illuminati or the International Communist Jewish
Banker’s Cabal, or whatever), your natural tendency will be to attribute
any unexplained phenomenon to that single cause. This is how children
think. Get over it. Grow up. Think like a scientist. Every event is a
separate event and must be analyzed on the basis of the empirical data
available.
<A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝo subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
