On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:39:57AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote: > > > I said many texts. > > Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and > nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.
I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well. So when you're dealing with someone who resorts to that kind of crap, what's the point? -- Harmon Seaver CyberShamanix http://www.cybershamanix.com
