On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:57:19 -0700
Razer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Detroit, stripped of it's industry,
> >
> >
> > And here we have 'commie' 'progressive' rayzer, actually
> > your typical americunt fascist, crying over the demise of the
> > detroit auto industry, poster child of americunt fascist
> > industry. And it gets even better - just look up rayzer's
> > histerical rants about cars and how the DMV is the anarchist
> > saviour of humanity.
> >
>
> If you were actually literate,
So, let's see
"Detroit, stripped of it's industry, then, over decades, the
industrial workers, has been techie hipster gentrified." sic
For starters, you don't know how to spell possesive pronouns.
What you meant is "Detroit, stripped of ITS industry",
"it's" <-- that's a short form for "it is". "its" <--
that's a possesive pronoun. Get the difference?
You are talking about detroit, that's the subject of the
sentence. Then it looks as if you were going to actually say
something about the poor fascist 'workers' but you didn't
finish the second clause!
"then...the industrial workers" - WHAT about the industrial
workers?
And your sentence ends with "has been...gentrified" - that
obviously refers to detroit since the verb is in ITS singular
form.
> you'd note I was discussing the plight
> of the workers for whom working at a factory no matter the corporatist
> owners and pollution etc is a damn sight better than sleeping in a
> doorway
and now you are saying that your beloved workers either have to
work for GM or starve? Ah rayzer your stupidity skills are
really stunning.
but I doubt a booshie assjack like you, a Lou Proyect clone
> with a foul mouth, has actually ever slept in a doorway .. so my
> point MIGHT be lost on you.
>
>
> Rr
