On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 21:19:18 -0000
[email protected] wrote:
> I think you misinterpreted me, I am not defending planned economy, The
> cooperation that I was referring to is between market agents to form
> cartels
You actually mentioned cooperation between pseudo-market
actors and the government. You pretty much answered your own
question and refuted your own argument.
Now, the standard 'economic' answer for the hypothetical
case of a real free market (which never existed, nor of
course exists today) is that as the profits for a few
businesses or 'cartel' increase, other people will start
*competing* with them.
Plis, a free society also does have strong
cultural requirements. For instance while fake
libertarians, especially the randroid-americunt kind
worship big business, a really libertarian culture
requires distrust of all kinds of concentration of power,
including economic power.
> and extract the most value from their product. The
> mathematical fact comes from game theory. There is a strong incentive
> for market agents to collude and control the price. Once one small
> group of cartels controls the market, it is impossible to other
> agents to enter.
>
> It is an honest question. I am an anarchist myself but cannot think
> of a solution to this problem without regulation.
Well, your own example showed what regulation does...to
increase the power of fascist/corporatists business. (the kind
of business Sean Lynch loves!)
If on the other hand you are an anarchist who thinks that the
only solution is for the 'right' and 'good' people to control
the state, then please...do some more homework =P
J.
