> Why would using, e.g., 
> 'Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae%'
> not work for you in this case?

Thanks for pointing this out.  This works for me.

Somehow I keep forgetting that I'm not restricted to the tags as presented
in the tree, but can use arbitrary SQL patterns, including wildcards.
--
Thorsten Ohl, Wuerzburg Univ., Physics -- http://physik.uni-wuerzburg.de/ohl

[email protected] wrote: -----
To: "Darktable Users List" <[email protected]>
From: "August Schwerdfeger" 
Sent by: [email protected]
Date: 2018-04-25 02:49PM
Subject: Re: [darktable-user] Subtags in collections changed in 2.4.3

That change did not create any new behavior, but instead restored the  behavior 
from before version 2.4.0. See       
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/1662 for the       rationale 
behind it.

Why would using, e.g., 
'Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae%'
 not work for you in this case?

--
August Schwerdfeger
[email protected]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:03 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm a bit disappointed by the changed treatment of subtags in collections
 which is labelled a "Bugfix" in 2.4.3:
 
    When collecting by tags, don&#8217;t select subtags
 
 (the corresponding commit is 7428d2e0484d8727eca8a9a8e7cdbf53eb6b44e2).
 
 To me, the previous behaviour was a feature and not a bug.  Assume that you're
 very geeky about tagging your pictures of animals and have pictures of two 
geckos
 in your collection
 
   
Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae|Hemidactylus|Hemidactylus
 frenatus
   
Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae|Phelsuma|Phelsuma
 borbonica
 
 Previously, you could collect
 
   
Animals|Vertebrata|Gnathostomata|Tetrapoda|Diapsida|Lepidosauria|Squamata|Gekkonidae
 
 and find the pictures of all geckos.  Since 2.4.3 one has to logically OR all 
subtags.
 In the example of the two gecko species, this is not a big deal, but if you 
want all
 pictures of birds from a specific year, it gets very tedious.
 
 Am I missing something or is there a chance to revert this change?
 --
 Thorsten Ohl, Wuerzburg Univ., Physics -- http://physik.uni-wuerzburg.de/ohl
 ____________________________________________________________________________
 darktable user mailing list
 to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
 
 
  
____________________________________________________________________________ 
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to 
[email protected]  
=
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to