The bottom up order makes sense since in a larger list of modules the modules
for the color and tonal correction are usually in the upper visible part of the
screen; the mandatory modules usually not needing tweaks or to be modified just
once at the beginning of editing are in the invisible lower part...
> Am 15.02.2021 um 22:26 schrieb KOVÁCS István <k...@kovacs-telekes.org>:
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:37, Urs Schütz <u.sch...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
>> @kneops
>> My two cents:
>> Darktable pipelines work from bottom to top. [...]
>> The developers choosed "from bottom to top"
>
> I think it may be reasonable to add an option to flip the visual order
> (so not completely free reordering, just a boolean top-to-bottom
> ('page-order') or bottom-up ('stack-like') display choice). My
> reasoning is that in Western writing systems, we read and write from
> top to bottom. I understand that the pipeline is also called a
> 'stack', and the 'last' element on the stack means 'the most recently
> pushed one', and it's at the top. But, I guess, for many users, a
> presentation where the last element of the history is at the bottom;
> where one of the the first modules to apply (such as exposure) appears
> near the top of the page, not near the bottom; where the pipeline, in
> execution order, is displayed top-to-bottom, is a very logical
> expectation.
>
> Kofa
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
