On mercredi 17 février 2021 17:39:23 CET Maurizio Paglia wrote: > First of all I desire to point out it was not my intention to be rude or > blame nobody. > Nevertheless the reply " that's quite easy - because none of those who want > this feature become > active, fork the code and simply implement the stuff ... " is really > impolite. > I cannot write C and cannot start learning C at 52 only to send a pull > request that will be ignored...
Keep in mind that that particular reply was given *after* OP's question was answered with an explanation why changing the current interface was not a good idea (according to devs and several users). And *after* a few others jumped in claiming that it (or something similar) should be implemented because "intuitive interface". I got the impression they thought that it couldn't be all that difficult to do... So it was proposed they do the work (after about 70 messages in the thread). Oh, and while you claimed you were not asking to change the dt GUI, in practice what you are asking *is a change in the interface*. Currently, changing the module order has a well-defined effect: it changes the pipeline order *to reflect the module order in the interface*. And changing that link between user action and effect is a change in the interface (and a rather important one). "The interface" is not just how things look on the screen, it's also how interacting with it influences the program's behaviour and results. ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
