On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Daisuke Maki wrote: >> I think I'd feel better if all of that locale/language specific stuff >> was in one place? Maybe strftime() should be absorbed there ...?
On 1/4/03 12:37 pm, Dave Rolsky at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: > Having strftime() in DateTime.pm is also inconsistent, but I suspect most > people find it pretty useful, so I'm inclined to leave it there. Personally I would agree that while it's useful, it should be moved to DateTime::Format::StrfStrp or some such. We're having strptime in another module, so shouldn't strftime be there too? If not, shouldn't strptime be included in DateTime? That would be useful too. (This new ::Format could be a default install when you install DateTime) Cheers! Rick -------------------------------------------------------- There are 10 kinds of people: those that understand binary, and those that don't. -------------------------------------------------------- The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is the day they start selling vacuum cleaners --------------------------------------------------------
