> -----Original Message----- > From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:50 PM > To: Griffis, Brad > Cc: Sergei Shtylyov; DaVinci > Subject: Re: omap-L1xxx (WAS: [patch 0/6] EDMA interface updates) > > On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Griffis, Brad wrote: > > > > I suspect that until patches appear, discussion can get no > > > > further. Plus, if it's going to be "mach-omap-L1" it'd > > > > be good to have enough detail that the OMAP team (and RMK) > > > > can see why it should pair with "plat-davinci" instead of > > > > the more obvious "plat-omap". > > > > Although it has OMAP in the name, the OMAP-L1xx family is much > > closer to Davinci than OMAP. > > I'm sold on that, mostly because of the peripherals, > but that doesn't quite address the issue. Some of > the points below apply to OMAP1, for example: using > arm926, DSP-qua-DSP, no PRCM, etc
The devices were called the OMAP-L1xx rather than OMAP1xx for the specific reason so as to not be confused with the older OMAP1 devices! Looks like that didn't quite work. :) Here are some fundamental differences between OMAP1 and OMAP-L1: * 55x DSP vs 674x DSP * MMU on DSP for OMAP1 * OMAP-L1 has EMAC * OMAP1 has OCP and L4 interconnects, not SCR > All I'm saying is: make sure everyone who needs to > agree on this, at a technical level, does so. If you feel it's necessary, feel free to email anyone you want. Personally I am convinced that OMAP-L1xx has little in common with OMAP1. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
