On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:32 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> > Ok. Does anyone have any suggestions for improvement to this proposal, or
> > are there any other options someone would like to see on the ballot?
> I would like to added the following to the ballot:
>
> 0. decides to override the ftp team decision to remove the
> ia32-libs-tools package from the archive, finding insufficient
> technical justification to warrant its removal.
> Without 0 I have already lost before the vote even begins.
While I believe that you have correctly inferred the sense of the
committee, and have indeed failed to convince us to over-rule the
ftp-master team... I'm willing to include an affirmative choice on this
ballot.
So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion,
and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines:
agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the
ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is
therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this
vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition
the technical committee to reconsider this issue by
communicating further justification for their original decision.
Does this make sense to the rest of the committee?
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
