* Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [090830 17:52]: > On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 10:23 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [090830 09:09]: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > * Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [090825 21:09]: > > > > > So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion, > > > > > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines: > > > > > > > > agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the > > > > > ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is > > > > > therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of > > > > > this > > > > > vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition > > > > > the technical committee to reconsider this issue by > > > > > communicating further justification for their original > > > > > decision. > > > > > > > How about: > > > > ... archive, or provide the maintainer and the technical committee > > > > further justification for their original decision. In that case the > > > > committee will make another final decision on this topic, considering > > > > the justifications. > > > > > > Is there an agreement about which of these to put on the ballot, or > > > should I > > > include each of these proposals separately? > > > > Bdales and mine shouldn't be both on the ballot - Bdale, which one > > should be on it? > > I don't really care. I like the wording of mine better, since it > doesn't make stumble over the word 'final'. But I don't expect either > to garner many votes, so I'm not inclined to spend more time polishing > the text.
I don't really care either. I too like the wording of mine better - but well. Steve, please just put on the ballot whatever you think, but not both. Cheers, Andi > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
