Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com> writes: > So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion, > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines:
> agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the > ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is > therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this > vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition > the technical committee to reconsider this issue by > communicating further justification for their original decision. > Does this make sense to the rest of the committee? I have no objections to having it on the ballot, although it seems kind of pointless to me when no one on the TC has indicated any support for that option. Although I suppose there are TC members who haven't spoken up in the discussion so far. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
