On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [090825 21:09]: > > So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion, > > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines:
> > agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the > > ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is > > therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this > > vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition > > the technical committee to reconsider this issue by > > communicating further justification for their original decision. > How about: > ... archive, or provide the maintainer and the technical committee > further justification for their original decision. In that case the > committee will make another final decision on this topic, considering > the justifications. Is there an agreement about which of these to put on the ballot, or should I include each of these proposals separately? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
