Eli Zaretskii [29/Jun 7:38pm +03] wrote: > If they use the released Emacs NN.1 instead, what's the difference? > They will still see the regressions.
One of us is missing something. We are talking about unreleased changes on the emacs-NN branch. So, after the release of NN.2, say, the changes on emacs-NN that will go into NN.3 but are not yet released. In that situation, these changes will not get much testing because after the release of NN.1 or at least after NN.2, most people will be either running master or the released version. >> Right now loads of people are running emacs-31 so regressions caused by >> fixes we've installed there are much more likely to be detected. > > I would hope (and expect, TTTT) people to start using Emacs NN.1 as > soon as it is released. That's what I do. My production sessions > always run the latest official release or a pretest of the next > release. I think you might be unusual in this regard. I think most people switch to master once NN.1 is out, at least on the machine they do Emacs development on. -- Sean Whitton
