Eli Zaretskii [30/Jun 4:50pm +03] wrote: > Now, it's true that people running NN.k will not see regressions > introduced on the emacs-NN branch after NN.k was released, but if > those regressions are reported by people running master, and if we try > reproducing them on emacs-NN before deciding whether the regression > should be fixed there or on master, why does all of that matter? > [...] > Then they will see on master the regressions introduced in emacs-NN, > and we should remember to try the recipes on emacs-NN even if they are > reported for master. Then we can decide on which branch to fix the > regressions. > > What am I missing?
I have in mind regressions that only show up on the emacs-NN branch even if an identical fix is on both that branch and master. This sometimes happens due to complex interactions. -- Sean Whitton
