> From: Sean Whitton <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 10:54:19 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii [30/Jun 4:50pm +03] wrote: > > Now, it's true that people running NN.k will not see regressions > > introduced on the emacs-NN branch after NN.k was released, but if > > those regressions are reported by people running master, and if we try > > reproducing them on emacs-NN before deciding whether the regression > > should be fixed there or on master, why does all of that matter? > > [...] > > Then they will see on master the regressions introduced in emacs-NN, > > and we should remember to try the recipes on emacs-NN even if they are > > reported for master. Then we can decide on which branch to fix the > > regressions. > > > > What am I missing? > > I have in mind regressions that only show up on the emacs-NN branch even > if an identical fix is on both that branch and master. This sometimes > happens due to complex interactions.
OK, but that's quite rare, IME.
