On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 16:53:35 +0000, Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And you may not mind being called immoral.  I do.  Sticks and stones etc.  I 
> never did buy that.

This is true. I'm an extremely sensitive person in real life. My furious
responses to provocation have probably made that clear, as well as my desperate
need to have the last word. These are all shortcomings of mine.

Even little things. When you said 'bully to you' twice after my one of my
rants, I nearly lost it. I felt utterly trivial and lost. I literally felt
crushed. I don't know why.

I never call people immoral. I call their actions unethical, at most. Human
nature is neither here nor there. There is no intrinsic evil. Actions can be
criticised for their negative consequences- even so, I prefer to call such
things unethical- it is a softer way of putting things, and 'morality' has
'religious' (?) connotations I would rather avoid.

Also 'ethical' sounds better than 'moral'. It has a more... analytical air to
it, rather than a gut decrying-type thing.

I think Mario went a bit too far there, in comparing open-sourcers to
'misbehaving children'. Regardless of our disagreements, we shouldn't resort to
blatant condescension.

I'm sorry. To everyone really. I should (lol- there it is again) have stepped
aside earlier. I'm sorry.

Reply via email to