Also, realize that on servers processing a large volume of messages per day, the additional IO necessary to create duplicate messages and header files for each specific recipient would be a death sentence...
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:30 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? To create a duplicate message for each recipient is not a trivial issue. This is a function of the mail server not Declude. David Barker Director of Product Development Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:08 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? Delcude has always functioned like this. What declude could do in this case is to duplicate the message for each recipient and write a new header file to each recipient. Not a big issue. Deliver to the one that whitelists and run the spam checks for the others. Kevin Bilbee > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:37 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > It's actually more of an issue of how the mail server handles the > message. > In the case of multiple recipients, since there is only one message > file addressed to multiple recipients in the headers, it's either > deliver or not deliver unless you rewrite the headers to modify the > recipient list. I think I'd rather not have the spam filtering system > alter that. Add to the header, yes. Alter the recipients, no. > > Also, I have not come across a situation where I wanted to let a > message go through to one recipient and not to others, except in the > situation of lists which is a whole other topic. > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <declude.junkmail@declude.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:11 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > > I would call that a flaw, then, in how Declude processes the whitelist. > > I have a listserver email address for which I do not want email spam > checked. This is because I don't want messages going out to the list > that say SPAM in the subject line. Because nobody who is not a member > on the list can post to the list, there is no problem whitelisting the > "TO" > address > for mail sent to the list server email address. > > However, spammers will send an email to a dozen of our mail addresses > (12 > recipients) one of which is the whitelised "TO" address for the > listserver. > Because of the way Declude processes the whitelist, that means that > the other 11 recipient receive the spam even though mail to them is > not whitelisted. > > That is a bad design on Declude's part, wouldn't you agree? Anyone > else feel that this needs to be rectified? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darrell > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:25 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > > > If one user is whitelisted they all will be whitelisted for that > email. > > There are some things you can do to prevent this like > > BYPASSWHITELIST > test. > > > > Darre;; > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > --- > > Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude > And > > Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI > integration, > MRTG > > Integration, and Log Parsers. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <declude.junkmail@declude.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:18 AM > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting flaw in Declude? > > > > > > If an email is received that is addressed to multiple recipients, > > one > of > > whom is whitelisted, does Declude treat the email as whitelisted for > all > > recipients? > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
