Andreas I'd probably agree, PostgeSQL/Cygwin solution would be not my preferred solution, But then why persist with Windows as a server unless you have some windows centric service that you couldn't ditch. Linux/Samba/PostgreSQL would replace most Windows Servers.
Currenty we would install a W2K box running TS as the main application Server and Linux for other Services (FireWall./VPN/Mail/SQL etc) I wouldn't be surprised in a few years time that we flip, That the main App Server is Linux and we keep and old W2K Server for those few old apps we can't manage to port Neven ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Toth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:43 PM Subject: RE: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > Thanks! That's all I wanted confirmed (that you're using Cygwin, that is). > > What are your thoughts on the following article when it comes to PostgreSQL > under Wintel? > > http://www.skippingdot.net/2002/10/14 > > > -Andreas > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Neven MacEwan > Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:23 > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > Subject: Re: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > Andreas > > Linux and Windows (using CygWin) > It's all documented on www.postreSQL.org > > Neven > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andreas Toth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:59 PM > Subject: RE: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > > Neven (and anyone else who uses PostgreSQL), > > Do you run PostgreSQL under Wintel or Lintel? If you run it under Wintel, > > under what set-up? > > > > > > -Andreas > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Neven MacEwan > > Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 15:38 > > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > > Subject: Re: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > > > > James > > > > If performance was the only issue you'd be using PostgreSQL > > > > > http://www.computerworld.com.au/idg2.nsf/All/2ADD84E6EBCEADE9CA256CB30075FA0 > > 1!OpenDocument > > > > Neven > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Sugrue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:37 PM > > Subject: Re: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > > > > > Never used the others but I had to port an app from Interbase to SQL > > Server > > > (for reason already stated). SQL Server is a dog in my books. Things > were > > > noticably slower under SQL Server. > > > > > > I agree with your other comments re cop out etc. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Jeremy North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:27 PM > > > Subject: Re: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well I must say that I don't put Interbase into the same light as an > MS > > > SQL > > > > Server or Oracle or Sybase. > > > > I use Interbase when I need a little more than a desktop database. > > > > Generally my interbase apps are either single user, or very low in > > > > continuous users. > > > > > > > > > I have heard of several projects switch from Interbase to SQL Server > > in > > > a > > > > > corporate environment, because Interbase wasn't a company standard > db > > or > > > > the > > > > > PTB had never heard of Interbase. > > > > > > > > Well Borland can't really control the "wasn't a company standard" cop > > out. > > > > I say a cop out (not at you personally) but at the fact that it is > > surely > > > > possible to make any software package a "company standard". > Interested > > to > > > > know how those projects are performing under MS SQL Server compared to > > > > Interbase and also if the conversion costs were worth it, and if they > > want > > > > to sell me there old licenses! > > > > > > > > The second part of the statement is partly Borlands fault, but could > > also > > > > be attributed to the companies lack of research prior to making > > decisions. > > > > > > > > > Not in the least. I was just trying to make the point that Borland > > must > > > > have > > > > > foreseen this when they opensourced IB6.0 > > > > Perhaps they did this to renew there motivation towards the product > > ;-))) > > > > > > > > JED. > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/01/2003 12:12:19 PM: > > > > > > > > > Not in the least. I was just trying to make the point that Borland > > must > > > > have > > > > > foreseen this when they opensourced IB6.0 > > > > > > > > > > I think Firebird is a great initiative. IBPhoenix too. Borland would > > be > > > > > better off worring about competing with SQL Server than Firebird. > > > > > > > > > > I have heard of several projects switch from Interbase to SQL Server > > in > > > a > > > > > corporate environment, because Interbase wasn't a company standard > db > > or > > > > the > > > > > PTB had never heard of Interbase. > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Jeremy North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:29 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [DUG]: Win 98 SE > > > > > > > > Which if you take the position that Borland considers Firebird > a > > > > > > > competitor > > > > > > > > now makes a certain kind of sense (at least from their view > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A competitor of their own (Borland's) making. > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems you are upset by this... I think it's great. It will > > continue > > > > to > > > > > > push the development of both database's to be better. A definate > > > > win-win > > > > > > for us developers. > > > > > > > > > > > > Until the feature sets get further apart, I don't see a reason why > > you > > > > > > would want to support both Interbase and Firebird. Most of the > > > > features > > > > > > are the same (at the moment). I recall reading that one of the > > > > interbase > > > > > > component 3rd parties (can't remember but there are only 3 of them > > > > > Borland, > > > > > > the ones used in Quick Desk and the ones used in Workbench) was > > hoping > > > > to > > > > > > remain Interbase and Firebird compatible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JED > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > > > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > they > > > > > > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > > notify > > > > > > the [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > - > > > > > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > > > > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > > > > > Web Archive at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > > > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > > > > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > > > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz > To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with body of "unsubscribe delphi" > Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body of "unsubscribe delphi" Web Archive at: http://www.mail-archive.com/delphi%40delphi.org.nz/
