I'm happy either way. Though in the rest of Java EE, there are no "annotation packages". Perhaps we should align with the way things are laid out in the Java EE packages.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi @ all, > > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all our > annotations within a package. > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > annotations. > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > "annotation". > > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" package > and some don't) > -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > > regards, > gerhard > -- Jason Porter http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp
