Unfortunately even the EE specs are not in agreement whether or not to have an annotation package.
I think we should drop the packages. On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Jason Porter <lightguard...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm happy either way. Though in the rest of Java EE, there are no > "annotation packages". Perhaps we should align with the way things are laid > out in the Java EE packages. > > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Gerhard Petracek < > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi @ all, > > > > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all our > > annotations within a package. > > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > > annotations. > > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > > "annotation". > > > > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" > package > > and some don't) > > -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > -- > Jason Porter > http://en.gravatar.com/lightguardjp >
