drop em.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is > just superfluous. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM > > Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s > > > > hi @ all, > > > > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all > > our > > annotations within a package. > > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > > annotations. > > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > > "annotation". > > > > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" > > package > > and some don't) > > -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > >
