yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this is just superfluous.
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM > Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s > > hi @ all, > > we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all > our > annotations within a package. > however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > annotations. > e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > "annotation". > > currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" > package > and some don't) > -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > > regards, > gerhard >
