On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: >> I think we should remove this extension immediately. > > Hi, > that sounds quite radical, does it not? > > Removing everything what has bugs, instead of fixing them, what would > you ship to your users? > >> It provides limited value, since you almost always want to skip >> through the pretty little trace to see the full backtrace anyway. > > Different people, different usages. What you do not use maybe others > do. I see many regressions in the recent changes in GNOME bugzilla > which simply break my workflow with it, built and fine-tuned during > many years of using it, but nobody cares. They know better what I > should do and how, it seems. > >> And this confusing bug is very serious. > > Hmm, did you hit that bug yourself? I did not. I see it's filled since > 2015, with 18 CC'ed users. That's not a low number, but there had been > filled thousands of backtraces during that time, with no problem so far > (I believe so at least, I do not have exact numbers, thus if anyone can > correct my expectations, then I'm all fine). > Bye, > Milan > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
+1: I am supportive of the initiative. After catching up with the discussion, my personal pros and cons are: Pros: - reviewing patches is significantly clearer in gitlab - code browsing is better than cgit - gitlab snippets introduce a bit more flexibility than pastebin - easy to publish new repositories with toy/new projects Cons: - not a big fan of the merge-request workflow - we will have a bunch of useless forks across the users' accounts In terms of issue/bug tracking, I am more concern about the migration itself. I would initially use gitlab to replace cgit and pastebin, and keep bugzilla as the bug tracker for a little while (not introducing new components/modules on bugzilla anymore, pointing at gitlab). One common thing I do with git-bz is interactively applying patches. Is there a clear 101 workflow for this kind of review with gitlab? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
