Also one more idea from me. Not sure if this already has a bug request. Why don't apps in the Marketplace have a clear indication of what license they are released under?
It's hugely frustrating not knowing if an app is free software or not. Could be very simple to implement. On 04/12/15 01:19, Leo Francisco wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a few ideas from me... > > I think all of these features look like a great idea. Don't underrate > all the security/privacy features on this list. Cyanogen Mod is hugely > popular because of the integration (whether through 3rd party apps or > not) of features such as VPN, PGP, Tor, Full Disk Encryption, Owncloud > etc. Remember that the people who are using FFOS are exactly the sort > of people who appreciate this sort of stuff. > > Sorry, I'm a bit of an outsider here (being more of a user than a dev) > but I think it's incredibly important to sort out the OTA updates. > This is where Android completely falls down. I hope this is something > FFOS can get right. I was stranded on 1.3 on the ZTE Open C until I > flashed a community build. We've come a long way, but we need to > ensure users are never left behind on an old rickety version of FFOS. > It's bad for everyone. > > Add-ons will also be a massive draw for people. I can't impress enough > how much us geeks and techies love to tweak our OS's. > > So for me, the main features that will keep me here are: > > * Well implemented OTA updates (with the choice of channel: Stable, > Aurora etc.) so I'm always up to date with the great progress the > project is making. > * Better OwnCloud and Firefox Sync integration (Card Dav, Web Dav, > CalDav is broken for me with self signed cert). > * Full Disk Encryption, to protect my data if phone is lost or stolen. > > > Sorry for the ramble. > > Best regards > Leo > > > > > > > > On 03/12/15 19:46, Sam Foster wrote: >> The disagreement, I think, is in the belief that addressing the >> most-voted foxfooding bugs in this list >> <http://foxfooding.github.io/dashboard/> will meaningfully change our >> position. I don't think that list contains enough meaningful data to >> be referenced as a substantial part of our strategic trajectory. > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
