> The disagreement, I think, is in the belief that addressing the most-voted > foxfooding bugs in this list <http://foxfooding.github.io/dashboard/> > will meaningfully change our position. I don't think that list contains > enough meaningful data to be referenced as a substantial part of our > strategic trajectory. >
A request to implement CardDAV doesnt seem like it requires a substantial change to our strategic trajectory? And no-one is suggesting we delegate product strategy to the crowd. This is a channel for input - no more or less. In that context, 300+ votes seems like quite a large number. I suspect we would struggle to get the same consensus even internally around some of the features we've shipped. In this particular case perhaps we would accept a patch? In that case a mentored bug(s) seems like that best action. I take your point about ticking feature boxes. By itself it isn't a strategy (build it and they will come.) Maybe as our actual strategy crystallizes we'll get feature requests that better align with where we want to go. /Sam
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
