Same here. We are using FreeBSD and Apache right now, and it is just great! We have also used UNIX/Apache and seemed like a very reliable setup.
REALIZE! I have no intensions of any "FLAME WAR". Just curious what other webmasters preference is. Maybe we just had a lousy experience. However, even on our desktop machines with Windows, memory management is lousy. After 2 days all the machines need restarted. Memory just seems to "Disappear!" So it didn't surprise me that the windows server package followed suite.... -- Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.4CheapDomains.Net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fagyal Csongor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:37 AM Subject: Re: opensrs v2.52 install problem on win2k > > > > I am not sure who can help you there. I think most all are running > > Linux/Unix that I have talked to in here. Our personal experience while > > testing Windows OS with servers was poor memory management and too many > > server crashes. Do you ever have that? We tried several different > > installations on different machines but it seemed Linux just could not be > > beat. I am curious as to what others opinions are we thought about > offering > > a windows based hosting machine also as some may prefer it over Unix (Not > > sure why ;) but it seems more trouble than it is worth. > > > > Curious about others thoughts ;) > Well, let's not start a Linux/Windows flame war here :-) Using open source > vs. M$ is sort of a religious question ;-) > > OTOH Linux is better :-)) At least it is more stable, scalable, flexible and > cheaper. We are running configurations Windows will never be able to beat. > (E.g. MySQL based email-configuration and XML controlled DNS, both with a > web interface.) > > - Cs. > >
