On 3/31/14 1:34 PM, smaug wrote: >> Promise.jsm and Promise are still interoperable from the functional >> point of view, the difference is in the above non-functional >> characteristics. Promise.jsm also has better performance due to the >> fact that it avoids the JavaScript / C++ / JavaScript turnaround >> time on chain resolution, > Has this shown up in profiles? If so, could you please give links to the > profiles, since > we should get fast promise handling to the web platform.
I don't remember that we did any benchmark on this. I seem to remember that this was an assumption based on a discussion with bz a long time ago, but it might have been someone else. Numbers would be interesting, though. Paolo, do you have plans to perform benchmarking? Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
