On 31/03/2014 13.42, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > I don't remember that we did any benchmark on this. I seem to remember > that this was an assumption based on a discussion with bz a long time > ago, but it might have been someone else.
Yes, memory was my source too. On 31/03/2014 13.34, smaug wrote: > Based on the code inspection both seem to do pretty much the same thing. > Post a runnable to the event loop and then process all the callbacks in > on batch. And if that's the case, and the C++ / JavaScript transition does not cost a lot, probably our assumption on performance was wrong. On 31/03/2014 13.42, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote: > Numbers would be interesting, though. Paolo, do you have plans to > perform benchmarking? Not at present. I'd like to focus on the blockers, and as I already said I don't think performance is a hard blocker, even if it might be different from one implementation to the other. Cheers, Paolo _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
