On Friday, February 22, 2019 at 2:21:24 PM UTC-7, Wayne Thayer wrote:
> The recent Reuters report on DarkMatter [1] has prompted numerous questions
> about their root inclusion request [2]. The questions that are being raised
> are equally applicable to their current status as a subordinate CA under
> QuoVadis (recently acquired by DigiCert [3]), so it seems appropriate to
> open up a discussion now. The purpose of this discussion is to determine if
> Mozilla should distrust DarkMatter by adding their intermediate CA
> certificates that were signed by QuoVadis to OneCRL, and in turn deny the
> pending root inclusion request.
> 
> The rationale for distrust is that multiple sources [1][4][5] have provided
> credible evidence that spying activities, including use of sophisticated
> targeted surveillance tools, are a key component of DarkMatter’s business,
> and such an organization cannot and should not be trusted by Mozilla. In
> the past Mozilla has taken action against CAs found to have issued MitM
> certificates [6][7]. We are not aware of direct evidence of misused
> certificates in this case. However, the evidence does strongly suggest that
> misuse is likely to occur, if it has not already.
> 
> Mozilla’s Root Store Policy [8] grants us the discretion to take actions
> based on the risk to people who use our products. Despite the lack of
> direct evidence of misissuance by DarkMatter, this may be a time when we
> should use our discretion to act in the interest of individuals who rely on
> our root store.
> 
> I would greatly appreciate everyone's constructive input on this issue.
> 
> - Wayne
> 
> [1] https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spying-raven/
> 
> [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1427262
> 
> [3]
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/hicp7AW8sLA/KUSn20MrDgAJ
> 
> [4]
> https://www.evilsocket.net/2016/07/27/How-The-United-Arab-Emirates-Intelligence-Tried-to-Hire-me-to-Spy-on-its-People/
> 
> [5]
> https://theintercept.com/2016/10/24/darkmatter-united-arab-emirates-spies-for-hire/
> 
> [6]
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/czwlDNbwHXM/Fj-LUvhVQYEJ
> 
> [7] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1232689
> [8]
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/certs/policy/

find another way.  do NOT ALLOW DARK MATTER.  Seems pretty straightforward to 
me, as per EFF.  What would be the rationale? 
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
            • ... Benjamin Gabriel via dev-security-policy
            • ... Jakob Bohm via dev-security-policy
            • ... lmelinte--- via dev-security-policy
            • ... Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy
            • ... Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy
            • ... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
            • ... Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy
            • ... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
            • ... nadim--- via dev-security-policy
            • ... Jonathan Rudenberg via dev-security-policy
  • Re: DarkMatter Conce... andrewtipton.finearts--- via dev-security-policy
  • Re: DarkMatter Conce... Jaime Hablutzel via dev-security-policy
  • Re: DarkMatter Conce... Jaime Hablutzel via dev-security-policy
  • DarkMatter Concerns racingtree--- via dev-security-policy
  • DarkMatter Concerns jeff--- via dev-security-policy
  • Re: DarkMatter Conce... Ken Myers (personal capacity) via dev-security-policy

Reply via email to