I want to caution everyone that this process skates close to an edge of an Apache invariant. An online forum has the potential to exclude people in far-away time zones or with other constraints. At Apache, we try to maximize the use of email to avoid this problem.
Nothing here is an absolute -- I'm not trying to torpedo this plan altogether. Nothing, that is, except except that _decisions_ must be made on the mailing list afterwards. If anyone in the dev community feels excluded by this prospect, I would encourage you to speak up now, so that the planners can make adjustments to minimize that. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rina...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Eric Newton <eric.new...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is CAS? >> >> - Switch to Curator. >> - Monitoring. I'm hoping this will just be integration with an existing >> tool. >> - Namespaces. >> - A simple query language. Perhaps there's something we can collaborate >> with some of the other NoSQL folks. >> - Update the wiki search example. >> - Automatic tablet merge. >> - Scalable NN >> > > Is scalable NN == ACCUMULO-722? I'd be excited about that for 1.6. > > Billie > > > >> >> Some of these don't need design documents, but some discussion of >> requirements would be nice. >> >> -Eric >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: >> >> > This will be very useful. >> > >> > Some new features I am thinking about for 1.6 are replication, CAS, >> > and Percolator. I would like to put together a bit of an initial >> > design document for each of these. I'm thinking that a follow up >> > online deep dive on the design of each large new 1.6 feature would >> > also be very useful. >> > >> > In the coming week I plan to spend most of my time testing, >> > documenting, fixing bugs, and polishing 1.5.0. I do not think this >> > would leave much time to work on 1.6. So interleaving design >> > discussion about new 1.6 features while 1.5 is being polished would be >> > nice. So once 1.5.0 ships, I would have peer reviewed designs to >> > start implementing. >> > >> > Keith >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Fuchs <afu...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > Folks, >> > > >> > > Now that we're past feature freeze for 1.5, I'd like to set up a >> > discussion >> > > of the features that Accumulo developers are interested in for 1.6 and >> > > beyond. The purpose of this discussion will be to raise awareness of >> > > projects that you think are cool and important, and to rally the >> > community. >> > > As a proposed format, let's plan on a series of 2-5 minute >> presentations >> > of >> > > individual features -- what it is, why it's important, how should we >> > build >> > > it, and who needs to help. We'll record the presentations for >> posterity. >> > > >> > > Since the community is now distributed throughout several states, let's >> > try >> > > our hand at an online discussion. Depending on participation, we'll >> pick >> > a >> > > forum that can accomodate everyone. If you're interested in attending, >> > > please fill out this doodle with what time you would be available: >> > > http://www.doodle.com/w9zb77ya3ykxr4zv >> > > >> > > If you can, please try to fill out the survey by Tuesday afternoon. >> After >> > > we get a good feel for times and participation, I'll schedule an online >> > > forum and send out a meeting invitation. If you would like to present a >> > > feature, send me an email directly at afu...@apache.org, and I'll make >> > sure >> > > you get time to present it. >> > > >> > > I look forward to seeing what everyone has up their sleeves! >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Adam >> > >>
