That would have also been my assumption since it was not otherwise
stated. However, given the nature of this vote, I believe non-binding
votes should also be carefully considered.
On 6/6/13 10:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
I would assume all our votes are "community welcome to vote, only
committers binding."
Billie
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:52 AM, David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>wrote:
Who is voting - the accumulo community, the PMC members, or some other
subset of people?
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:51 PM, David Lyle <dlyle65...@gmail.com> wrote:
-1 Prefer to stay on java 1.6 until pulled by features or eol.
-D...
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, German Gutierrez
<gutierrezg...@gmail.com>wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I vote for in favor.
Thanks
German A. Gutierrez
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
wrote:
All-
Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java
dependency to >=1.7.
Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the
text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the
consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a
specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free
to
state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of
the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant
to come to a concrete opinion.
If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0.
I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal
to
me. I just want a concrete resolution.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org>
wrote:
I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos
authentication
behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on
the
Accumulo implementation as well.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote:
<snip>
CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support:
http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html
<snip>
CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7:
http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1
The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code.
--
Sean
