I would assume all our votes are "community welcome to vote, only committers binding."
Billie On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:52 AM, David Medinets <david.medin...@gmail.com>wrote: > Who is voting - the accumulo community, the PMC members, or some other > subset of people? > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:51 PM, David Lyle <dlyle65...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > -1 Prefer to stay on java 1.6 until pulled by features or eol. > > > > -D... > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, German Gutierrez > > <gutierrezg...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > I vote for in favor. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > German A. Gutierrez > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > All- > > > > > > > > Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java > > > > dependency to >=1.7. > > > > > > > > Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the > > > > text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the > > > > consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a > > > > specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free > to > > > > state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of > > > > the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant > > > > to come to a concrete opinion. > > > > > > > > If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0. > > > > > > > > I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal > to > > > > me. I just want a concrete resolution. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos > > > > authentication > > > > > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on > > the > > > > > Accumulo implementation as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote: > > > > >> <snip> > > > > >> > > > > >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html > > > > >> > > > > > >> > <snip> > > > > >> > > > > >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1 > > > > >> > > > > >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code. > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Sean > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
