Hello Everyone, I vote for in favor.
Thanks German A. Gutierrez On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > All- > > Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java > dependency to >=1.7. > > Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the > text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the > consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a > specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to > state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of > the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant > to come to a concrete opinion. > > If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0. > > I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to > me. I just want a concrete resolution. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos > authentication > > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on the > > Accumulo implementation as well. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote: > >> <snip> > >> > >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support: > >> > > >> > > >> > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html > >> > > >> > <snip> > >> > >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7: > >> > >> > >> > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1 > >> > >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code. > >> > >> -- > >> Sean > >> >
