All- Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java dependency to >=1.7.
Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant to come to a concrete opinion. If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0. I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to me. I just want a concrete resolution. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos authentication > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on the > Accumulo implementation as well. > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote: >> <snip> >> >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support: >> > >> > >> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html >> > >> > <snip> >> >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7: >> >> >> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1 >> >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code. >> >> -- >> Sean >>
