+1 --Jason
sent from my DROID On Jun 5, 2013 6:10 PM, "John Vines" <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > -1 then > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > The vote was already called, and it was a vote on whether we should do > > it now (now, as in for Accumulo 1.6.0 development). If you think more > > time is needed, then your vote should be no. I don't think it's > > productive to continue to have a meta-discussion about whether or not > > a discussion/vote should occur. Just vote "-1", with a reason "not > > enough time to address potential concerns". > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Given this thread, I think more discussion is necessary before a vote. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> All- > > >> > > >> Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java > > >> dependency to >=1.7. > > >> > > >> Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the > > >> text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the > > >> consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a > > >> specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to > > >> state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of > > >> the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant > > >> to come to a concrete opinion. > > >> > > >> If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0. > > >> > > >> I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to > > >> me. I just want a concrete resolution. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Christopher L Tubbs II > > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos > > >> authentication > > >> > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on > the > > >> > Accumulo implementation as well. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote: > > >> >> <snip> > > >> >> > > >> >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html > > >> >> > > > >> >> > <snip> > > >> >> > > >> >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7: > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1 > > >> >> > > >> >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code. > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Sean > > >> >> > > >> > > >
