-1 then
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > The vote was already called, and it was a vote on whether we should do > it now (now, as in for Accumulo 1.6.0 development). If you think more > time is needed, then your vote should be no. I don't think it's > productive to continue to have a meta-discussion about whether or not > a discussion/vote should occur. Just vote "-1", with a reason "not > enough time to address potential concerns". > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > > Given this thread, I think more discussion is necessary before a vote. > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> All- > >> > >> Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java > >> dependency to >=1.7. > >> > >> Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the > >> text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the > >> consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a > >> specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free to > >> state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of > >> the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant > >> to come to a concrete opinion. > >> > >> If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0. > >> > >> I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal to > >> me. I just want a concrete resolution. > >> > >> -- > >> Christopher L Tubbs II > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos > >> authentication > >> > behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on the > >> > Accumulo implementation as well. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <b...@sqrrl.com> wrote: > >> >> <snip> > >> >> > >> >> > CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html > >> >> > > >> >> > <snip> > >> >> > >> >> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1 > >> >> > >> >> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code. > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Sean > >> >> > >> >
