It should be totally obvious by now that not everyone saw the initial proposal as a wholesale replacement with HornetQ and then some code taken from the horribly slow and rudderless AMQ5. You’re seeing a LOT of “wait a minutes…” now that it is clear. You don’t buy it but it’s still the feeling (true or not). I’m sorry you’re unable to empathize with the many here who feel that way. But its the reality we’re facing. If we want to see HornetQ become the new core (I do). Then it’s time to take a step back, and start building support in the community.
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 3:07 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > I thought that was the initial proposal thread where I didn't see anyone > saying even "wait a minute…" So I don't buy that this was forced down > anyones throat. And if it was totally clear to me, who just barely manages > to follow the lists occasionally, that the proposal was to use the hornetq > broker with all the non-broker activemq goodies I really don't see how anyone > more involved could have thought differently.
