I can add a powered by logo :) I will add this in my todos.
Cheers Mike Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Jul 2017, at 15:33, Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On the “about” page - it would be polite to reference the hawtio comunity - > i.e. “Artemis Management console is powered by hawtio: hawt.io > <http://hawt.io/>” etc - as there is no powered by logo. > >> On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:52, Michael André Pearce <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> >> wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> So i think we can do this. From a local build. >> >> Please see screenshots. >> >> https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03 >> <https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03> >> >> For 1) I think we have managed to completely skin it, with all hawtio >> references removed, even the favicon. >> For 2) Only the artemis plugin and base jvm plugins, no extras for any other >> products. >> For 3) Im hoping we can come to agreement on this gets contributed in from >> the rh-messaging project @clebert @martyn @andy?, if not we can probably >> code up a simpler version of it for now without bells and whistles, and add >> in the future features later. >> >> So if we sort point three, i think we can make this “acceptable” >> >> Cheers >> Mike >> >>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 19:17, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Michael André Pearce >>>> <michael.andre.pea...@me.com <mailto:michael.andre.pea...@me.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I believe we could make a simple activemq branding jar/war with the >>>> selected new logo ;) once decided without too much trouble. >>>> >>>> I'd be happy to step up to try do this if no objectors. >>> >>> I discussed previously, what would NEED to be done for this to be >>> “acceptable”: >>> >>> 1) All branding/links/etc… in the console need to be re-skinned or whatever >>> to be “ActiveMQ”. All mentions of hawtio and links off to other sites >>> other than a possible small “powered by” type thing would need to be >>> removed. >>> >>> 2) All “plugins” and functionality that don’t pertain to things related to >>> ActiveMQ would need to be removed. >>> >>> 3) The “plugin" that presents ActiveMQ related stuff to the user MUST live >>> here at Apache and part of the ActiveMQ community. We cannot use the one >>> they provide (unless you can convince them to donate it to Apache). >>> >>> Unless all three happen, it’s a no-go. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that >>>>> was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of >>>>> apache >>>>> >>>>> I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & >>>>> feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin maybe? >>>>> that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do >>>>> a lot of work anyways. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce >>>>> <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote: >>>>>> I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss logging, >>>>>> this doesn't have a notice file >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects >>>>>> themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <w...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ 5.x >>>>>>> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many >>>>>>> common >>>>>>> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a >>>>>>> gap in >>>>>>> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome built-in >>>>>>> hawtio support as a good addition. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Although the source code already contains the standard license >>>>>>> assignment >>>>>>> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for one, >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza to >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package and >>>>>>> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be >>>>>>> changed >>>>>>> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < >>>>>>> michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly any >>>>>>>> movement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of management >>>>>>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially as >>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>> picking up traction and deployment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other >>>>>>>> solution and >>>>>>>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out there >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> wild. (It's ASL) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with >>>>>>>> Hawtio >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis project?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any objectors? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >>>>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html >>>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Clebert Suconic >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> <http://dankulp.com/blog> >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>> <http://coders.talend.com/> >
