What is the "rh-messaging project" ???? On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:34 PM, MichaelAndrePearce [via ActiveMQ] < ml+s2283324n4728194...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Ok, > > So i think we can do this. From a local build. > > Please see screenshots. > > https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef > 03 <https://gist.github.com/michaelandrepearce/ > 98b4be98d20f407c2d745a41df9cef03> > > For 1) I think we have managed to completely skin it, with all hawtio > references removed, even the favicon. > For 2) Only the artemis plugin and base jvm plugins, no extras for any > other products. > For 3) Im hoping we can come to agreement on this gets contributed in from > the rh-messaging project @clebert @martyn @andy?, if not we can probably > code up a simpler version of it for now without bells and whistles, and add > in the future features later. > > So if we sort point three, i think we can make this “acceptable” > > Cheers > Mike > > > On 29 Jun 2017, at 19:17, Daniel Kulp <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=0>> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Michael André Pearce <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=1> <mailto:[hidden > email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=2>>> wrote: > >> > >> I believe we could make a simple activemq branding jar/war with the > selected new logo ;) once decided without too much trouble. > >> > >> I'd be happy to step up to try do this if no objectors. > > > > I discussed previously, what would NEED to be done for this to be > “acceptable”: > > > > 1) All branding/links/etc… in the console need to be re-skinned or > whatever to be “ActiveMQ”. All mentions of hawtio and links off to other > sites other than a possible small “powered by” type thing would need to be > removed. > > > > 2) All “plugins” and functionality that don’t pertain to things related > to ActiveMQ would need to be removed. > > > > 3) The “plugin" that presents ActiveMQ related stuff to the user MUST > live here at Apache and part of the ActiveMQ community. We cannot use the > one they provide (unless you can convince them to donate it to Apache). > > > > Unless all three happen, it’s a no-go. > > > > Dan > > > > > >> > >>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Clebert Suconic <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=3>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Speaking the plain truth... The issue is that the hawtio console that > >>> was used years ago.. looked like a commercial product outside of > >>> apache > >>> > >>> I think that if we clear that now.. if it looks an apache look & > >>> feel.. people wouldn't have an issue with it. > >>> > >>> > >>> That would require some cleanup.. move to a newer hawtio plugin maybe? > >>> that's when we thought about trying new routes if we would need to do > >>> a lot of work anyways. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Michael André Pearce > >>> <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=4>> wrote: > >>>> I don't think this is a blocker, for example artemis uses jboss > logging, this doesn't have a notice file > >>>> > >>>> I think we just have to preserve them if present and for asf projects > themselves eg artemis itself it's policy to provide one for the asf work. > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> > >>>>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:09, W B D <[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=5>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I've been using hawtio alongside the classic web console in ActiveMQ > 5.x > >>>>> and have been quite happy with it. I find it easier to use for many > common > >>>>> operations as well as for general monitoring, and it is definitely a > gap in > >>>>> the current Artemis distribution, so I would certainly welcome > built-in > >>>>> hawtio support as a good addition. > >>>>> > >>>>> Although the source code already contains the standard license > assignment > >>>>> to ASF, it does not include a NOTICE file. We could ask Redhat for > one, or > >>>>> construct one crediting them with the original work, or add a stanza > to the > >>>>> top-level NOTICE file if that is more appropriate. IMO, the package > and > >>>>> class name org.jboss.plugin.PluginContextListener could probably be > changed > >>>>> in our copy, both to establish custody and to give a clearer name. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, MichaelAndrePearce < > >>>>> [hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=6>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Guys, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's been some time since this discussion thread without seemingly > any > >>>>>> movement. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Artemis Project is really suffering from having any kind of > management > >>>>>> console. With continued questions and calls from users especially > as it's > >>>>>> picking up traction and deployment. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As such could I propose, that as lack of movement on any other > solution and > >>>>>> Hawtio is pretty much in a usable state, with a plugin also out > there in > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> wild. (It's ASL) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That for the interim on artemis project we build and release with > Hawtio > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> an artemis plugin (if RH would donate their plugin to artemis > project?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any objectors? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. > >>>>>> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728020.html > >>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [hidden email] <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=7> > <mailto:[hidden email] > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4728194&i=8>> - > http://dankulp.com/blog <http://dankulp.com/blog> > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com <http > ://coders.talend.com/> > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console- > tp4717136p4728194.html > To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - Dev, email > ml+s2283324n2368404...@n4.nabble.com > To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - Dev, click here > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2368404&code=YXJ0QGFtbGludi5jb218MjM2ODQwNHwyMDc3NjQwODU5> > . > NAML > <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Removing-the-Web-Console-tp4717136p4728204.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
