You did mention Jamie Goodyear, but I would have expected him to speak for himself in this regard. The vague reassurance that "others" will help when something important comes up does not inspire me with confidence. I would have also expected these others to chime in here to make it clear who is committed. I don't like to argue from silence, but the fact that still nobody on this thread has identified themselves as being committed to this code-base concerns me. I just don't think it serves our community well to imply there are people committed to a code-base when apparently none are.
Justin On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. > > I think I mentioned Jamie Goodyear had showed interest to help with JIRAs > and know there are others who will help when important JIRAs pop up. I > think those APIs are simple clients that probably don’t require a lot of > loving care and are relatively stable. I don’t think stackoverflow is > necessarily a good indicator of its use. They are pretty simple to > utilize. > A better indicator of user base is number of downloads. But I don’t know > if > we track that. Also remember these are not major components of AMQ. They > are just connectors so I don’t expect heavy activity. > > Also, if there truly are openwire alternatives, then I get your point. But > STOMP and AMQP are not openwire. > > I would agree that there is not likely to be much additional enhancements > to > them as they do what they do. But I do see serious bugs getting fixed by > some of the committers. I think the release of them needs to be fixed and > this came up earlier on CMS, but there was no resolution. I do know Jamie > wanted and offered to fix it. > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >
