Hi All, I'm still alive - learning life as a new parent, slipping a little on reading all the threads for projects I contribute too (Apache, Linux Foundation, etc).
In regards to contributing to CPP client, I picked on some issues there earlier in the year. Discovered that master branch was not the primary maintained branch. After some discussion its clearer how future maintenance, and bug fixes can occur. That information was not clear to find, it only became clear after rejected PRs. Given its not always clear what is happening with a sub project if its not very active, clear readmes and docs are very nice to have. I would like to see them stay, minimally as APIs. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:50 AM jgenender <jgenen...@apache.org> wrote: > > Justin, what seems to be the problem? Not everyone follows every thread, so > they don't always speak up. They don't have to. The JIRA and comments in > past threads speak for themselves. I am simply pointing that out. > > It seems like you are trying to kill this. You have had a couple of people > say there is value. If you want to cut the web part of it because its a > PITA, thats fine by me. But the APIs as projects should stay. If you want > to link back to old doc, so be it. > > -1 from me to removing those code bases. I am open to leaving them as a > sub-project for code only with a nice readme.md. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
